# @StephenCMeyer: Topical List of linked posts Profile: [[Users/@StephenCMeyer/@StephenCMeyer|@StephenCMeyer]] · [[Users/@StephenCMeyer/Chronological List|Chronological List]] > **Coverage.** Only the posts Marshall has linked for research: 1 post so far. This is **not** his timeline. ## Theme counts | Theme | Posts | |---|---:| | T1: Intelligent design, scientific consensus and Discovery Institute's case | 1 | ## T1: Intelligent design, scientific consensus and Discovery Institute's case Topic hub: [[Topics/Intelligent Design and Origins Debate/Intelligent Design and Origins Debate|Intelligent Design and Origins Debate]] (see [[Topics/Intelligent Design and Origins Debate/Timeline|Timeline]]). - **Oct 24, 2026, 11:05 AM CT**: [post](https://x.com/StephenCMeyer/status/2114025373927141837). Posts the intelligentdesign.org tagline word for word ("A growing number of scientists agree…") with a screenshot of the site's Articles page. [[Users/@StephenCMeyer/Post Analyses/Post Analysis - StephenCMeyer on IntelligentDesign.org and the Growing Number of Scientists Claim (2026-10-24)|Analysis]]: ❌ misleading on its headline claim. The site is real, free and run by Meyer's own Discovery Institute center. But no count of ID-endorsing scientists exists, the "growing" Dissent from Darwin list says signing does not endorse ID, and AAAS, the NAS and the Kitzmiller court reject ID as science.